From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 5 09:27:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4B816A48C; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:27:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AF443D48; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:27:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) by outbound0.sv.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k059QtpD007331; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:27:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/meer) with ESMTP id k059QBdt008408; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:26:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) id k059QBwk008407; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:26:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:26:11 -0800 From: Jo Rhett To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Message-ID: <20060105092611.GI1358@svcolo.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Matthew D. Fuller" , "Patrick M. Hausen" , Daniel O'Connor , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, current References: <200512231136.12471.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200512230851.jBN8pFVv060458@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20051223085657.GF63497@over-yonder.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051223085657.GF63497@over-yonder.net> Organization: svcolo.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, current Subject: Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006 ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:27:05 -0000 > Patrick M. Hausen, and lo! it spake thus: > > Any suggestions for an alternative to NFS if your 'client' servers > > are located "all over the world" and you want to installworld across > > the Internet? I was planning to use NFS/TCP secured by IPSec > > transport mode, but anything less complicated would be greatly > > appreciated ;-) On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:56:57AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > This is one of the situations where r{dist,sync}'ing out the binaries > makes more sense than NFS mounting and running installworld (which > would be awful awful slow, above and beyond security and convenience > issues). This works fine for small patches (ie cvs patch last year). How do you handle configuration changes/comparisons? (ie mergemaster stuff?) -- Jo Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation