From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jul 12 1:32:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72C737BD54 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 01:32:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA84352; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:31:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Wes Peters , Warner Losh , Alfred Perlstein , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why don't section 4 pages live with their drivers? References: <78679.963388979@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 12 Jul 2000 10:31:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn's message of "Wed, 12 Jul 2000 10:02:59 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn writes: > On 12 Jul 2000 09:31:54 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > I second this; kernel-related man pages should live in the kernel > > source code, but should not be spread all over and clutter up the > > source directories. > You sure it's worth 1.2MB of repo bloat? One tenth of a percent? Couldn't care less. It'll hurt people cvsupping or ctming over slow lines, but not much more than, say, a gcc or perl upgrade or a new branch tag. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message