From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 3 20:25:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42FE16A41F; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:25:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jester@panix.com) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D7943D49; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:25:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jester@panix.com) Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E7359621; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:25:38 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jester@localhost) by panix2.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id jB3KPcB24363; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:25:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:25:38 -0500 From: Jesse Sheidlower To: Werther Pirani Message-ID: <20051203202538.GA28990@panix.com> References: <20051203043336.34840.qmail@web53411.mail.yahoo.com> <20051203184823.GA18894@panix.com> <4391F9FD.8000803@nexgo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4391F9FD.8000803@nexgo.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FireFox not starting in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 20:25:40 -0000 On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 09:03:09PM +0100, Werther Pirani wrote: > Jesse Sheidlower wrote: > > >>i cant get FireFox to start! It built fine, no errors, > >>but it just doesnt start. > >> > >>(There's no output from doing that: > >> > >>$ firefox > > > >The same thing happens with mozilla. Apparently you have to > >run it as root, and then it works fine--is anyone else seeing > >this behavior? > > Just out of curiosity: are the permissions on ~/.mozilla okay? > > It's weird but, for some reason, I had mine changed from 700 to 600 and > experienced exactly the same behaviour. How odd--yes, it wasn't exactly the permissions but the ownership was root instead of the ordinary user. When I chowned it to myself both programs work fine. Thanks for the suggestion. I wonder why more people aren't experiencing this. Jesse Sheidlower