Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 09:29:10 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lpr/lpd and HP networked printers Message-ID: <19970924092910.HV02996@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199709240022.TAA10018@nospam.hiwaay.net>; from dkelly@hiwaay.net on Sep 23, 1997 19:22:02 -0500 References: <19970923190412.GM59568@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199709240022.TAA10018@nospam.hiwaay.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As dkelly@hiwaay.net wrote: > Well, that doesn't mean it can't or shouldn't be changed. Seems to me if > one puts sh in a printcap entry for a remote printer, then that's what > one wants and it shouldn't be ignored if there is any way to implement. Well, i don't mind if somebody would do the deed... :) -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970924092910.HV02996>