From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 10 11:57:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8114A16A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:57:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net [81.16.160.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD9C43D41 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:57:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@hasta.se) Received: from [192.168.15.68] (helo=fmd) by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with smtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BYOBh-00012b-BQ; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:57:41 +0200 From: "Matt Douhan" To: "ROBERTO SIANO" , Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040610114531.03DE543D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: SV: ***SPAM*** HA cluster X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:57:47 -0000 -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fran: owner-freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Hi there can you suggest a good HA solution based on freeBSD servers, like the following. Load balancing TCP+UDP on virtual ip + failover on the routers. ( net ) | | | ---------- | switch | ---------- / \ / \ ---------- ---------- failover | active backup router | | router | ---------- ---------- load-balance \ / \ VIP / ---------- | switch | ---------- / \ / \ ---------- ---------- | server1 | | server2 | ---------- ---------- real servers This solution make no real sense, why have HA servers when you do not have HA switches?, you are likely to set yourself up for disappointment is all, use seperate switches as well in order to get a real HA solution. Also in order to give more accurate answer we would need to know what applications/services you will be providing, there is a huge difference between all TCP and only wanting HTTP/HTTPS failover and so on. regards Matt