Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 21:59:25 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Matteo Riondato <matteo@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, small@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Implicit port tag (was: [HEADSUP] TinyBSD and ports applications) Message-ID: <20061102205925.GX20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20061102181700.GC30863@kaiser.sig11.org> References: <45489618.2000106@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20061102164938.GU20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20061102181700.GC30863@kaiser.sig11.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, (Cc'ed to ports@) On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Matteo Riondato wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 05:49:38PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > For instance, lets's you're building a TinyBSD image with > > net/nemesis which depends on net/libnet10. You neither have this > > later port installed. The current TinyBSD implementation will > > leave net/libnet10 installed on the build system, although I agree > > this is more a problem relatde to port infrastructure which doesn't > > record whether a port is an implied dependency or has been > > explicitely installed by the user. AFAIK. > > > > A workaround could be to null-mount the ports directory into the > > temporary folder were the TinyBSD image is built, then chroot into > > this folder and install the port from here. Afterward you would > > remove www,doc,share,include,man stuff. > > This is similar to what freesbie does when the installports plugin is > used. Note that if you really want a small image, you should remove Would it be possible to add a tag to ports that have been implicitely installed because of a dependency, either for build-time or run-time ? Cheers, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061102205925.GX20405>