From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Apr  2 22:23:38 1997
Return-Path: <owner-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA29948
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:23:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (wck-ca7-23.ix.netcom.com [204.31.231.55])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA29939
          for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSd.ORG>; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:23:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.9) id WAA17166; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 22:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199704030622.WAA17166@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jimd@dutton4.it.siu.edu
CC: taguchi@tohoku.iij.ad.jp, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSd.ORG,
        burgess@cynjut.neonramp.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970402184214.205B-100000@dutton4.it.siu.edu> (message from Jim Dutton on Wed, 2 Apr 1997 18:52:15 -0600 (CST))
Subject: Re: Tcl7.6 Scripts?
From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSd.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I consider "my" FreeBSD-2.2 system to be "adequate" for ANY port that is
 * distributed, where the port files do not indicate a requirement for
 * something that I don't already have. If a port requires a specific version
 * of BSD-PORT-MK, then there should be a note in the port files, to that
 * affect. 

Your system (at least bsd.port.mk) is not the release version of
FreeBSD-2.2 (or 2.2.1, which is identical as far as ports go).
tcl-7.6 is buildable on 2.2R.  Believe me, or how did I build the
package that's now sitting on ftp.freebsd.org's packages-2.2
directory? ;)

Moreover, as long as you take ports from 2.2-RELEASE/ports (or
ports-2.2, the extracted tree) on ftp.freebsd.org, they should all
build for 2.2R.  If you want to build ports from ports-current, you
may need the -current bsd.port.mk (which may or may not be enough to
build a particular port, of course, if the rest of your system is not
-current).

Satoshi