From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 09:19:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F5E16A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:19:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB3543D1D for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:19:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i24HJ1rZ072060; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:19:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3/Submit) id i24HJ0fd072059; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:19:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:19:00 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Edoardo Martelli Message-ID: <20040304171900.GC65562@abigail.blackend.org> References: <40475DCD.1050903@cern.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40475DCD.1050903@cern.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: network statement no more needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:19:06 -0000 On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 05:48:13PM +0100, Edoardo Martelli wrote: > Hi > > I'm a newbie with freebsd. > > This email is just to notify an inconsistency in the documentation. > > I'm using freebsd 5.2. I was reading this: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-routing.html > specifically: 19.2.5 Setting Up Static Routes > > and I tried these commands: > > route add network 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.2and > > # Add Internal Net 2 as a static route > static_routes="internalnet2" > route_internalnet2="network 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.2" > > but it seems the "network" statement is no more needed. > You're right, actually it's "-net" not "network". I did not checked that when I committed that part, it's my fault :( Marc