Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 17:51:41 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de> To: Ryan Steinmetz <zi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, ports@freebsd.org, portscout@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date Message-ID: <17C16E14-9FEA-4927-8E53-2E79EDE19446@waschbuesch.de> In-Reply-To: <20160311124143.GM4396@exodus.zi0r.com> References: <201603090833.u298X0li053372@portscout.freebsd.org> <66302EC60289E24E15A64493@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160309121614.GH4396@exodus.zi0r.com> <B59DF56603A2CF217BE856E0@atuin.in.mat.cc> <8637rxw8kw.fsf@FreeBSD.org> <20160311124143.GM4396@exodus.zi0r.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 11.03.2016 um 13:41 schrieb Ryan Steinmetz <zi@FreeBSD.org>: > > > On (03/11/16 12:35), Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: >> Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>> Someone already put: >>> >>> PORTSCOUT= ignore >> >> I did that in r410199, and tried a different approach first in r410104. >> It's not clear to me why these reports are still being sent. > > ignore: Set to 1 to tell portscout not to do any version checking at > all. Useful if, say, a particular port is not going to be > updated ever again, yet portscout still finds files that look > like updates. > > > PORTSCOUT=ignore:1 > > > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Ryan Steinmetz > PGP: 9079 51A3 34EF 0CD4 F228 EDC6 1EF8 BA6B D028 46D7 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi there, I was the person originally asking if we should not add PORTSCOUT=ignore to this port. To try and determine how this should be done. I was looking at both https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-portscout.html and the link mentioned on that page https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/distfile-survey.html Seeing as neither the PORTSCOUT page in the handbook nor the linked page contain the syntax needed in this case, maybe we should add the link to http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt to the porter's handbook? Best, Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17C16E14-9FEA-4927-8E53-2E79EDE19446>