From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 16:09:20 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF76F451; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay004.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay004.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB0790D; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:09:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al8GAHdLd1RbsIqE/2dsb2JhbABbgwZRTcdQhk0CgQkXAQEBAQF9hAMBAQQ6HCMQCw4GBAklDyoeBhOIRAEI0hcBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcEkDlCB4RNBZdMhzSXHYN9PjCBCIFCAQEB Received: from 132.138-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.176.138.132]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 27 Nov 2014 17:09:12 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sARG9Afo003716; Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:09:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:09:10 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: svn commit: r373042 - head/security/gnupg20 Message-ID: <20141127170910.1db6104d@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20141127104015.GC28816@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <201411220953.sAM9rHR0064411@svn.freebsd.org> <20141127104015.GC28816@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Jun Kuriyama , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:09:20 -0000 On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:40:15 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 09:53:17AM +0000, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > Author: kuriyama > > Date: Sat Nov 22 09:53:16 2014 > > New Revision: 373042 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/373042 > > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r373042/ > > > > Just taking that commit, but that is all about the whole gnupg mess. > > the introduction of gnupg2 has been a disaster for every user of packages that > needs other binutils. > > With this week package building everything single user of spamassasin for > example (just picking one) which hard depends gnupg1 gets pkg(8) asking them to > remove spamassassin if something they have pulls in the new gnupg, that is all > because gnupg1 is conflicting with the new gnupg: > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > spamassassin-3.4.0_13 > gnupg1-1.4.18_1 > New packages to be INSTALLED: > gnupg: 2.1.0_1 > > gnupg is a very important key software used by lots of packages upgrading it > should be done with way more care. > > gnupg 2.1 has been introduce 7 days ago, there was around 6 days to fix the > conflicts before package building start :( I would also prefer that security/gnupg is reverted back to 2.0. That is the current upstream stable release that other ports are known to work with. 2.1 is a development release. If it is at all needed to have it in ports it should be in security/gnupg21 or security/gnupg-devel.