From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 22:25:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC52C1065684 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483A48FC1F for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 975 invoked by uid 399); 16 Sep 2008 22:25:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 16 Sep 2008 22:25:14 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <48D03248.1040109@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:25:12 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Dupre References: <200809151036.19674.jhb@freebsd.org> <48CEBE6E.1030508@FreeBSD.org> <48CFCE01.4050304@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <48CFCE01.4050304@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org, John Baldwin Subject: Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:25:15 -0000 Alex Dupre wrote: > Doug Barton ha scritto: >> Bug, and at first glance I think your analysis is correct about the >> cause. > > Surely a bug, but the mentioned code is what was added in rev 1.560 > (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk?r1=1.560#rev1.560) > exactly to add this feature, and AFAIR it worked. The commit log refers to a different problem than John reported. The commit log refers to the problem of a saved options file that doesn't have all of the new OPTIONS for a new version of the port. John was referring to the problem of 'make config' not being called for ports being installed as dependencies of a port that has OPTIONS. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection