Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:34:16 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: NO_FOO knobs in make.conf Message-ID: <20030909.093416.91314918.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20030909153039.GA942@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030905.183837.116096286.imp@bsdimp.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309060440130.18871-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <20030909153039.GA942@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20030909153039.GA942@rot13.obsecurity.org>
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
: On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:42:12AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >
: > > In message: <20030905140628.H90946@12-234-22-23.pyvrag.nggov.pbz>
: > > Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> writes:
: > > : Once we get general consensus (not universal agreement :) on this, I'll
: > > : take responsibility for marshaling the aforementioned volunteer
: > > : resources.
: > >
: > > I'd just do it. we've already talked this to death. Lots of people
: > > want it, some don't. Every time we talk about it, that's the
: > > outcome. Let's just do it and get on with our lives.
: >
: > Or change all the NO*, NO_* to WANT_* and default them to yes.
:
: That would be inconsistent with the ports tree.
I liked the NetBSD approach, once Bruce mentioned it, but thought I'd
wait to see what people came up with before getting into things too
much at length.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030909.093416.91314918.imp>