Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 13:14:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Re: `Hiding' libc symbols Message-ID: <20030503201409.GA41554@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0305011046140.73226-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <XFMail.20030501140549.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030501182820.GA53641@madman.celabo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 01:28:20PM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > A lot of folks are focused on qpopper and strlcpy. I believe that > the big picture is being missed. I moved this thread to freebsd-arch > so that we could discuss how to hide all (or most, or non-standard) > symbols in libc. Not so that we could argue about this particular > commit. Perhaps you and a contentent of the rest are looking at different pictures. In the our big picture, we don't want this being done to most of libc. > I'm backing out the commit in good faith and in the hopes that the > big picture comes more clearly into focus. Thanks. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030503201409.GA41554>