From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Oct 25 08:39:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C210CC1F278 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x235.google.com (mail-lf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437CD1E24 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vmagerya@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id x79so215657480lff.0 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:39:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Ml4EPAoBpcL0jhsd3Gw09MpJ3WBPdozxcoAyhwYnto=; b=DuMMhm4gVXu+diECnGYMK6kmXp+npHiKeYT0+RTDdVNyUqTlpIXrdKJJV7tikr9SDe bUES6kSXqze4DYFVjmqPvYM99t4QnjW6nR12O6CbHKbiDAeS/kAD1B7X7UQu0eaSpqN7 vm03uudp4KFTOgChEbmzvGpsr0zbTl/TX79BdxRyhuJqrl/2B6flQsjdTwzz3MRUPmTm aBoSPvF/gSolTZASSJr3jFRZCPwMl7ewteskbsW71TK1kfH6H5T+w/gr+wqZ4TSK3Qrl uBRqlui8s+l/lxeswRtEqeQaaqq+sZddJjv5pcOPjrcPupjYM0nFHNb4NxQw6piAniev 9Gjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Ml4EPAoBpcL0jhsd3Gw09MpJ3WBPdozxcoAyhwYnto=; b=Y7rP+q1ZVzBKBCG1hEmKh0dEvjr3xknudF7a1L+d3H2N83wrmrPBKul0eXZ0FCYNJ6 GgCWQLf/d/N1NCixPnARObq4nUTon7vrcHy+2q1aerhuxA32W6lYpxzj9pefcJbrE92A XJ5X/cNsOV719/dWAAeoUDeHdmuBVCb8Y7gWouOX+1Svj66Uzqfy/EF8zPliorXQLhbM N1VbW2c8kbEw8/S9ps9z4sBqXRkDuu85twszziDlLCTfmVwSYrOT2bhtLxh8zm0jiz1Z nOC7ySXqqw6iHsHpDj9jcWpju6T5UDcqxB8Dwm6q9RQohMyNBS53Ecls/HYwSv/s1vUd AH0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfuFNnfZKja3lgk4Ev1i+03ortGG+otcfYfB6rA1yF3z9igK3HfkM+GQpNFk3Oqfw== X-Received: by 10.25.234.141 with SMTP id y13mr9989652lfi.25.1477384757077; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.29.2.94] (altimet-gw.cs2.dp.wnet.ua. [217.20.178.249]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm3733296ljg.44.2016.10.25.01.39.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 01:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted) To: Dave Hayes , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com> <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net> <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu> <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> From: Vitaly Magerya Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:39:53 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:39:19 -0000 > can anyone in > this thread explain why misc/jive is considered offensive and removed I'd like to extend the question: is there a new policy about "offensive" ports not being allowed in the ports tree any longer? If so, could someone point me to it? If not, then, well, I don't know what to say. You leave me very confused. Was the removal arbitrary? Is someone working on updating ports tree policies?