From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Jul 7 8:44:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from wso.williams.edu (wso.williams.edu [137.165.37.207]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560EE37C09C for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:44:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crichard@wso.williams.edu) Received: by wso.williams.edu (Postfix, from userid 1475) id C2E292E55A; Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:44:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:44:11 -0400 From: Chris Richards To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alterations to vops Message-ID: <20000707114411.A31035@wso.williams.edu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200007070143.SAA96248@apollo.backplane.com> <20000706184859.C25571@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000706223150.A24949@klapaucius.zer0.org> <20000707080934.I25571@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000707080934.I25571@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 08:09:34AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 08:09:34AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > The only problem is that for the "average case" you waste nearly > 3.5k per directory cached, so it's only really a win on systems > with large amounts of ram. In your estimation, how large is "large"? Of course each site should test to see what best suits its needs, but I'm looking for a rough idea. -chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message