From owner-freebsd-java Sat Jan 29 12:15:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.79.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02D3152FC for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:15:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@yogotech.com) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.79.115]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01235; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:15:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA10734; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:15:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 13:15:31 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001292015.NAA10734@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Thomas Runge" Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jdk1.3... In-Reply-To: <3892F4FC.CD95F566@rostock.zgdv.de> References: <38921472.CBA3BCC9@jollem.com> <200001282223.PAA05460@nomad.yogotech.com> <3892F4FC.CD95F566@rostock.zgdv.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > How about skipping 1.2 and go straight to 1.3? It wouldn't make things go any faster, and would slow things down as we'd have to start over from scratch. > And how about cooperating with the Blackdown-team? Been there, tried that. They're as busy as we are, and co-ordinating work has been difficult at best, impossible at worst... Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message