From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jun  2 21:25:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA02502
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 21:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA02495
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 21:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA09364; Mon, 2 Jun 1997 21:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Ari Suutari <ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi>
Subject: Re: natd 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Jun 1997 01:17:16 BST."
             <199706030017.BAA14374@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> 
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 1997 21:25:10 -0700
Message-ID: <9360.865311910@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Does anyone have any objections to me bringing natd into the main
> source tree under libexec ?

As long as it's updated to use libalias at the same, I see no reason
why not.  This is definitely one of those pieces of software which has
good reason to be bundled (unlike one of my all-time favories, tn3270 :-)

					Jordan