From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 4 15:26:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2971065694 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CCA8FC18 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pukruppa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pukruppa.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o04FRlYe000233; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:27:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from localhost (ulrich@localhost) by pukruppa.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id o04FRkZv000230; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:27:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:27:46 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: FreeBsd-Questions Subject: Re: sendmail: open-relay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:26:00 -0000 Something doesn't add up here -- the log shows the message being > processed > by SpamAssassin, but there was no indication in the sendmail .mc file > you > showed us of any integration with a spam filter. I'd expect some sort > of > milter configuration. spamassassin came with evolution (Gnome's Mailer), I never configured anything for that. > Unfortunately as well, the log line showing the delivery result > is > usually > one of the ones *following* the line showing the external MTA > handing > off the message to you. Try grepping for the sendmail queue > IDs: > > o04BQi0O008964 > o04BWBOA010672 > o04CSb9P056503 > o04CZkfq058137 > etc. > > The lines that say 'dsn=' are the important bits. > If > > is 2.0.0 (ie. successful delivery) then you've got a real problem. > The result > should be 5.x.y (ie. permanent failure) and a snotty message > about > 'relaying denied'. > No, sorry, _I_ cannot find anything suspicious; everything listed there seems to be mails I really sent or received. I tried http://www.checkor.com which Jerry suggested, no problem. Perhaps this really is a problem with abuse.net . But anyway: Many thanks to you both. I wouldn't like to be the one person who sends all the "enhancement" mails. Uli. Cheers, > > Matthew > > btw. you need to update your SpamAssassin rules -- you're triggering > on the FH_DATE_PAST_20XX test all the time, which will give you some > false > positives. > >