From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 11:01:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3651216A4BF for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE63843FF9 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:01:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 85656 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Sep 2003 18:01:30 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Robert =?unknown-8bit?Q?Blacqui=E8re?= In-Reply-To: <20030908174121.GD68008@bombur.guldan.demon.nl> Message-ID: <20030908105928.J85644@root.org> References: <20030908010950.F22654@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030908093244.U85288@root.org> <20030908174121.GD68008@bombur.guldan.demon.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT cc: Doug Barton cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My acpi-errant laptop will be at the 'con X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:01:33 -0000 The reason why it's so different is that acpidump has been changed between when you dumped and patched it and now. The best way around this is to compile your modified ASL using iasl(8) and then disassemble it again using acpidump -f acpi_dsdt.dsl -d > acpi_dsdt_new.dsl and then diff that output against *orig. -Nate On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Robert [unknown-8bit] Blacquière wrote: > It's a lot ... 9666 lines... so i put it up on de site. > > plus the acpi code from current running bios. > > working patched version: > http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.dsl > > in bios version: > http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt_orig.dsl > > and the diff -u > http://www.guldan.cistron.nl/acpi_dsdt.diff > > Robert > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:33:19AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > Could you post a diff -u of this against the original ASL so I can know > > what issues it had? > > > > Thanks, > > Nate