Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Jun 2001 01:29:28 -0700
From:      Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
To:        ru@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ifmcstat(8) setgidness 
Message-ID:  <20010627082928.47C933E31@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010627111440.F2097@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.ORG on "Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:14:40 %2B0300"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > 
> > Is there a particular reason, other than the desire for more setgid
> > programs, that ifmcstat(8) is setgid kmem?  It seems that there's no
> > reason anyone but root would want to use it, anyway.  OpenBSD and
> > NetBSD already nuked its setgid bit; any reason why we shouldn't
> > follow suit?
> > 
> $ ifmcstat
> kvm_openfiles: Permission denied

I don't follow.  Yes, it needs access to kmem to work.  However, I
don't see why anyone other than root would need to run it, so why is
it setgid?  root can access kmem either way.

> 
> -- 
> Ruslan Ermilov		Oracle Developer/DBA,
> ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
> ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
> +380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine
> 
> http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
> http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age
> 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010627082928.47C933E31>