From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Nov 10 09:37:53 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA20910
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 09:37:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA20905;
          Sun, 10 Nov 1996 09:37:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id JAA17361; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 09:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611101737.JAA17361@relay.nuxi.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 09:37:56 -0800
From: obrien@NUXI.com (David E. O'Brien)
To: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi Asami)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk patch
References: <199611071851.KAA04683@relay.nuxi.com> <199611080814.AAA09685@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.48.1-PL0
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5
In-Reply-To: <199611080814.AAA09685@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami on Nov 8, 1996 00:14:33 -0800
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Satoshi Asami writes:
>  *     MANPAGES=       1/zmrx.1 1/zmtx.1
> 
> Actually, that's a good idea.  What do people think, is the MAN[1-9LN]
> set I sent out earlier or a single MANPAGES variable better?

I still kinda like the single MANPAGES vs. MAN[1-9LN].  But not very
strongly.

-- 
-- David    (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu)