Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 00:57:30 +0900 From: "R. Imura" <imura@af.airnet.ne.jp> To: asami@FreeBSD.org Cc: knu@idaemons.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese Makefile.inc ports/german Makefile.inc ports/japanese Makefile.inc ports/korean Makefile.inc ports/russian Makefile.inc ports/vietnamese Makefile.inc Message-ID: <20000412005730F.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <vqc4s99ox22.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> References: <86hfd9rzkz.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <86d7nxrtbj.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <vqc4s99ox22.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Index: Mk/bsd.port.mk
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/cvs/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk,v
> retrieving revision 1.334
> diff -u -r1.334 bsd.port.mk
> --- bsd.port.mk	2000/04/10 12:31:02	1.334
> +++ bsd.port.mk	2000/04/11 08:26:03
> @@ -491,6 +491,10 @@
>  # If they exist, include Makefile.inc, then architecture/operating
>  # system specific Makefiles, then local Makefile.local.
>  
> +.if ${MASTERDIR} != ${.CURDIR} && exists(${.CURDIR}/../Makefile.inc)
> +.include "${.CURDIR}/../Makefile.inc"
> +.endif
> +
>  .if exists(${MASTERDIR}/../Makefile.inc)
>  .include "${MASTERDIR}/../Makefile.inc"
>  .endif
Why not just do like this?
.if exists(${.CURDIR}/../Makefile.inc)
.include "${.CURDIR}/../Makefile.inc"
.endif
>  * I think it'd be bad if every slave port were to be forced to include
>  * `${.CURDIR}/../Makefile.inc' for itself before including
>  * `${MASTERDIR}/Makefile', so I'd suggest we prepare some files as
>  * follows:
I don't understand this part.
For example, korean/Wnn:
1. Read korean/Wnn/Makefile
2. Read ${MASTERDIR(= japanese/Wnn)/Makefile
3. Read Mk/bsd.port.pre.mk
4. Read ${.CURDIR(= korean/Wnn)}/../Makefile.inc
5. Return to ${MASTERDIR}/Makefile
6. Read Mk/bsd.port.post.mk
So, I think, including ${.CURDIR}/../Makefile.inc before
including ${MASTERDIR}/Makefile never occurs.
Is this my mis-understanding?
Or, are there any slave ports which include both of
bsd.port.pre.mk(or bsd.port.mk) and ${MASTERDIR}/Makefile
in their Makefiles?
-- R. Imura
// my private mail address has changed.
// imura@cs.titech.ac.jp ====> imura@af.airnet.ne.jp /(-.-)y-~~
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000412005730F.imura>
