From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Aug 12  1:54:14 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from not.demophon.com (ns.demophon.com [193.65.70.13])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B2B14FAD
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 01:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from will@not.demophon.com)
Received: (from will@localhost)
	by not.demophon.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id LAA59992;
	Thu, 12 Aug 1999 11:52:38 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from will)
To: chris@calldei.com
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libcompat proposition
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908112337400.81521-100000@janus.syracuse.net> <19990811225210.E772@holly.dyndns.org>
From: Ville-Pertti Keinonen <will@iki.fi>
Date: 12 Aug 1999 11:52:37 +0300
In-Reply-To: chris@calldei.com's message of "12 Aug 1999 06:52:20 +0300"
Message-ID: <86aerxmld6.fsf@not.demophon.com>
Lines: 9
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald"
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


chris@calldei.com (Chris Costello) writes:

>    I'm in favor of a libgnucompat rather than gnu functions in
> libcompat.

And how would a libgnucompat be different from libiberty?  Except of
course that it would be maintained by the FreeBSD folks...  Or that it
would be maintained at all.  ;--)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message