From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 1 22:00:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EB0106564A for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5DE8FC13 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n21LxnZt044067; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:59:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n21LxndM044064; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:59:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:59:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Andrea Venturoli In-Reply-To: <49AAF0AC.6080704@netfence.it> Message-ID: References: <49AAAA1C.4080804@netfence.it> <49AAF0AC.6080704@netfence.it> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tandberg RDX QuikStor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:00:01 -0000 >> >> i don't see a reason it should not. > > Although they are HD, they are sold as tape replacement. > I was told they are seen as tapes and last time I checked only SCSI tapes > were supported by FreeBSD. > > The whole thing might however not hold and they could be seen for what they > are: just hard disks. > > This is another good question... > > > > >> anyway - it's cardridges are more expensive than ordinary hard disks - >> doesn't make sense. > > On the cost you are right; they justify this with higher reliability. > Whether this is true or not, I don't know. for sure not.