From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 19:49:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47D3106564A; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38D98FC1A; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com ([10.2.2.95]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mBTJng8j022277; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:49:42 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:48:14 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: local ipv6 addresses do not appear in routing table Thread-Index: AclpsM7+4qSkPd0sT8qtw97gz/ghwgAPZR2R References: <037201c9693e$0c6ba24c$7202020a@internal.cacheflow.com> <49583F8F.2070406@boland.org> <4958C225.8070907@boland.org> From: "Li, Qing" To: "Michiel Boland" , Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: local ipv6 addresses do not appear in routing table X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:49:48 -0000 I will investigate further ... =20 In the meantime, would you mind give me the exact set of configuration/commands for what you want to accomplish ? =20 Thanks, =20 -- Qing ________________________________ From: Michiel Boland [mailto:michiel@boland.org] Sent: Mon 12/29/2008 4:27 AM To: Li, Qing Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: local ipv6 addresses do not appear in routing table Michiel Boland wrote: > Li, Qing wrote: >> Hi Michiel, >> >> Please apply the patch http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/in6.c.diff >> and let me know how it works out for you. > > Appears to work, thanks. It appears I was cheering too soon. I have another setup that has the 2a01:3a8:130::1 address on gif0, rather than lo0, as in ifconfig gif0 inet6 2a01:3a8:130::1/64 but here the route to 2a01:3a8:130::1/128 via lo0 does not appear. If I = create a default route that points to the gif0 interface, pings to = 2a01:3a8:130::1 work, but they are passed through the tunnel. I also tried things like ifconfig gif0 inet6 2a01:3a8:130::1/128 2a01:3a8:130::2 with the same results. Cheers Michiel