From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jan 19 19:32:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.122.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A0437B402 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.11.3/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g0K3XE665895; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:33:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:33:14 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: "Floris 'Tamama' van Gog" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kevent() in another thread In-Reply-To: <010201c19ee8$b7b68d00$9600000a@tamama> Message-ID: <20020119193242.T64528-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> X-All-Your-Base: are belong to us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Floris 'Tamama' van Gog wrote: > I read that kevent/kqueue weren't very thread-safe. Where did you read this? kqueue/kevent are perfectly threadsafe. Now, whether kevent is useful in threads is a totally different matter.... Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message