From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 17:31:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8C1106564A for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D4B8FC08 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 17:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30357 invoked by uid 399); 9 Nov 2010 17:31:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 9 Nov 2010 17:31:54 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4CD98589.604@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:31:53 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101028 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jimmiejaz@gmail.com References: <4CD95A75.7090403@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD95A75.7090403@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Doug Barton dougb"@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsclean -CDD oddness X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:31:55 -0000 On 11/09/2010 06:28, Jimmie James wrote: >> On 11/03/2010 23:46, Doug Barton wrote: >> portupgrade was updated today, I imagine to resolve this issue. > > Yes, the update $FreeBSD: ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade/Makefile,v 1.259 > 2010/11/08 07:56:14 stas Exp $ has fixed the issue of removing all > distfiles. > > Thank you! Don't thank me, thank stas. :) > Once I migrate this 7.3-STABLE to the latest 8.x branch, I'm planning on > using portmaster. I have a bit of a Bad Feeling about making the switch > with 1217 ports installed. I'm just waiting on getting my backup drive > returned to me. FYI, portmaster is completely ignorant about the scope of your installed ports ... it only takes into account the things you tell it to work on, whether that's one port or hundreds. And my understanding about portupgrade is that if something gets updated without it that on the next update of the database it takes that into account and then keeps on working just fine. But (honestly) I'm not trying to talk you into anything. :) Portupgrade is a fine tool, and I never have regarded portmaster as being "in competition" with it. Meanwhile, with 1200+ ports (yikes!) IMO you definitely do not want to try an in-place upgrade over a major OS version update. You might want to install portmaster and look in the man page at the end for the recommended "major version upgrade" procedure, especially if you plan to give portmaster a try on the new system. > You've helped a lot Doug, it's really appreciated, cheers! My pleasure. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/