Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:26:34 +0100 From: "Pietro Cerutti" <gahr@gahr.ch> To: Michal Varga <varga.michal@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gegl Message-ID: <20110302152634.GF1550@gahrfit.gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <1299077867.52738.5.camel@xenon> References: <201103011706.45759.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20110302075219.GA2182@reindeer.exwg.net> <20110302100645.GB2182@reindeer.exwg.net> <4D6E5691.9060906@yandex.ru> <1299077867.52738.5.camel@xenon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-Mar-02, 15:57, Michal Varga wrote: > On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 17:39 +0300, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > 02.03.2011 13:06, Christoph Moench-Tegeder =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1= =82: > > > ## Christoph Moench-Tegeder (cmt@burggraben.net): > > > > > >> Looks as if we (at least on 8.2) are missing log2(), log2f(), log2l(= ), > > >> even though they are in C99 (partially C89) and POSIX since at least > > >> 2008. (I can't find them in math.h, log2l() is commented out). > > >> If nobody else does, I might get around to workaround-patching this = later > > >> today. > > > > > > There it is: ports/155183 > > > Please check the patch there, in case I broke the math (logarithms are > > > easy enough, but anyway...). > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Christoph > >=20 > > Still doesn't builds for me. > > smeshariki2# sysctl kern.osreldate > > kern.osreldate: 802500 > >=20 > > If i change the check on something like: > > if __FreeBSD_version < 704000 || (__FreeBSD_version > 800000 &&=20 > > __FreeBSD_version < 803000) > >=20 > > then it build fine. > >=20 >=20 > Out of curiosity - how is it even possible that this update made it as > far as into ports tree, when it - at least as I understand from the PR - > clearly doesn't work on *both* *STABLE* *supported* branches and only > goes well with the very latest CURRENT? The original update doesn't cause any problems on CURRENT, 7.4-RELEASE, or 8.2-RELEASE. It does cause problems on STABLE branches. > Wouldn't a single test run on either 7.x or 8.x before committing the > port reveal this issue? Just my thoughts. Yes, it would have. I just don't have the infrastructure nor the time to test on all supported release + stable branches. --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk1uYaIACgkQwMJqmJVx946mmQCcDFdgetQyS3follRhTbMDqnZH efwAoK8g194yNiMWEU8CyU8gcUp4/ZwN =qmBS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gMR3gsNFwZpnI/Ts--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110302152634.GF1550>