Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Oct 1997 11:24:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Sam Magee <webadmin@adsight.com>
To:        "George M. Ellenburg" <gme@inspace.net>
Cc:        "'isp@freebsd.org'" <isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Frontapage extensions coredump under 2.2.2
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971006111332.1941A-100000@adsight.com>
In-Reply-To: <01bcd260$92d90200$f828cccf@caffeine>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I am also having some difficulties with FrontPage Server Extensions under FreeBSD 2.2.2, and am hoping you can assist as well, as I have just about given up.
> 
> After following Microsoft's instructions for installing Front Page Server Extensions, including applying a security patch, when I go to run 'fp_install' I receive the following error:
> 
> # ./fp_install
> Step  1: Checking to make sure that all necessary files can be found.
> Step  2: Examining srm.conf file.
> Step  3: Examining httpd.conf file.
> DocumentRoot `/usr/local/etc/httpd/htdocs' does not exist
> #
> 
> The strange part is, '/usr/local/etc/httpd/htdocs' *does* exist!  I have traced it to the Perl install script which in line 171 calls a stat function which apparently is not supported in my implementation of Perl?!
> 
> Any help and assistance you can provide would be greatly appreciated.  Am using Apache 1.2.4, but even tried this on 1.1.3 which they suggest.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> George Ellenburg

Are you running fp_install as "root"?
The Perl version I'm using is 5.003
Is the DocumentRoot statement actually in httpd.conf or srm.conf?

Also, to get the extensions to install, the directories and files
of the webs you're installing on have to be owned by the user
that the httpd runs as.  This is normally "nobody", but it's hard
to work as user "nobody" so I created a "www" account and let the
httpd run as that, and chowned my htdocs directory to "www".
This part is not necessary if you install the newer FP98-beta
extensions, which seem to be as stable as the FP97 ones were,
and the security options are more flexible.

The last weirdness with the FP97 extensions involved the we80.cnf
file.  Every new virtual web I used with Frontpage, I had to
copy it's config file (www.webname.com:80.cnf) to we80.cnf
Once I had used the extensions on that virtual web, then it would
continue to work even after copying a new virtual web config to
we80.cnf (Don't think I need to do this with the FP98 extensions).

-- Sam





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971006111332.1941A-100000>