From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 17 13:29:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937C916A400; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chukharev@mail.ru) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2-2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F6A13C441; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chukharev@mail.ru) Received: from [85.156.232.99] (port=63353 helo=localhost) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1HIPbe-0001m7-00; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:28:02 +0300 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:27:37 +0200 To: "Jeremie Le Hen" From: "V.Chukharev" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20070216174317.GZ64768@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, cognet@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwi leaks memory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:29:19 -0000 On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:10:24 +0200, V.Chukharev wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 19:43:17 +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> cognet@ has once provided me a tiny hack to the iwi(4) driver and >> I never get such errors. Maybe I'm not suffering enough UP/DOWN >> cycles to trigger it, but it might be worth trying it. >> >> Note that he has insisted that this is a *hack*. >> >> The patch is attached. Please let us know if it makes things >> better. > > I cannot apply the patch ;-( > It seems it's for CURRENT, and I run STABLE. I applyed the patch regenerated by Oliver against STABLE (I did not recieve the message, found it on the list archive, that's the reason for replying to myself). Yes, the patch helps. The driver did not complain after 100 down/up cycles. Before the patch, it started to complain usually after 6..8 cycles. >> Regards, > > All the best, Thanks! -- V. Chukharev