From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 29 20:00:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D4710656C9; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alson+ml@alm.flutnet.org) Received: from tafi.alm.flutnet.org (tafi.dsl.alm.flutnet.org [145.99.245.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7AB8FC12; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alson+ml@alm.flutnet.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tafi.alm.flutnet.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29B578C32; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:00:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at alm.flutnet.org Received: from tafi.alm.flutnet.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tafi.alm.flutnet.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmtbnV4EbRfB; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tafi.alm.flutnet.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A01B578C25; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:00:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:00:13 +0200 From: alson+ml@alm.flutnet.org To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090729200013.GB2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <1248027417.14210.110.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <200907232335.54973.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A6FF5FA.5010904@FreeBSD.org> <200907282342.25038.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A707534.8000808@FreeBSD.org> <20090729170601.GA2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A709981.80600@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A709981.80600@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:00:20 -0000 * Doug Barton [2009-07-29 20:48]: > How about this? When the user has -[rf] but not -R, and there are flag > files present, ask if they should be cleared before beginning to do > anything. Otherwise (no -[rf]) ignore them. Sound good? Sounds like a good solution for both problems (stale flag files and unexpected removal). It should default to removing the files with -u. I think that -R is a very useful feature of portmaster, so I'm happy to see it getting improved. Thanks! Alson