From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 04:44:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E221065674; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F42D8FC19; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JXJ003N4UH09CG0@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:43:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2B4hjg0000189; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:43:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:43:40 -0400 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <20080310153347.X1091@desktop> To: Jeff Roberson Message-id: <47D60DFC.90502@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 References: <200803102248.m2AMmRFv055635@repoman.freebsd.org> <47D5D680.9000302@gmail.com> <20080310153347.X1091@desktop> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080309) Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Jeff Roberson , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:44:34 -0000 Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > >> Jeff Roberson wrote: >>> jeff 2008-03-10 22:48:27 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD src repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> sys/kern sched_ule.c Log: >>> - Fix the invalid priority panics people are seeing by forcing >>> tdq_runq_add to select the runq rather than hoping we set it >>> properly >>> when we adjusted the priority. This involves the same number of >>> branches as before so should perform identically without the extra >>> fragility. >>> >> >> Does this fix the diablo panic I reported to you last week? >> > > I'm not 100% certain. I don't remember the details. You can always > try and find out. :-) > No it doesn't and as far I can tell cpio is what actually causes the panic