Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:26:42 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spliting kernel ipfw source ? (also involves sctp) Message-ID: <49AAFD92.105@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20090301153010.GA58942@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20090301153010.GA58942@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Hi, > I am planning to split netinet/ip_fw2.c in a number of smaller files > to make it more manageable, and while i do this I would also like > to move the files related to ipfw2 (namely ip_fw*c) to a better place. > Any objection to moving them to sys/netinet/ipfw2 ? > > Also, I can't help noticing that sys/netinet/ contains 36 files > related to sctp -- wouldn't it be the case to move them > (perhaps with the exception of the userland headers) > to a separate subdirectory ? for that matter it would be nice to put ALL teh protocols in their own subdirectories. tcp related files are also multiplying, with things like syncookies etc. > > (I know the same reasoning would apply to tcp, which has 23 files, > but the issue here is that there is 25 years of userland code expecting > the tcp headers in netinet/ and moving them would be a > nightmare for ports...) > > cheers > luigi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49AAFD92.105>