Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:00:40 GMT
From:      clutton <mbsd@isgroup.com.ua>
To:        freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   docs/170119: at behaviour and man at inconsistency
Message-ID:  <201207242100.q6OL0e1r031302@red.freebsd.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <201207242110.q6OLA9WB078763@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         170119
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       at behaviour and man at inconsistency
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Jul 24 21:10:08 UTC 2012
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     clutton
>Release:        9.0 Stable
>Organization:
isgroup.com.ua
>Environment:
FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r238253=7106c50-dirty
>Description:
>From man:

The at utility allows some moderately complex time specifications.  It
accepts times of the form HHMM or HH:MM to run a job at a specific time
of day.  (If that time is already past, the next day is assumed.)

Current behavior:

&#926; ~ &#8594; date
Tue 24 Jul 2012 09:17:36 EEST
&#926; ~ &#8594; at 09:18
echo tototo
Job 1 will be executed using /bin/sh
&#926; ~ &#8594; at 09:15
at: trying to travel back in time  <<<< HERE THE PROBLEM # If that time is already past the next day is assumed!!!!!!!!!!!
zsh: exit 1     at 09:15



Five, ok, may by more years ago, I don't remember exactly. at had worked
like the man explain. Who is responsible for at code?
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201207242100.q6OL0e1r031302>