Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 15:20:20 -0500 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i915 intel_frontbuffer_put panic, patch for review/testing Message-ID: <CAPyFy2ABRi1=rU5KOtRtWvH%2BVJJrqGz1SRtp45hNVLCkg3VLfA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <c2a6f4bc-db7f-cf32-7f2a-138569a925f8@nomadlogic.org> References: <CAPyFy2B-B9wvzCKYCz1LsCgM%2BSoSZzC_F5O0R0HiTgjzWb1bFQ@mail.gmail.com> <c2a6f4bc-db7f-cf32-7f2a-138569a925f8@nomadlogic.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 22:39, Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> wrote: > > On 1/28/21 5:49 PM, Ed Maste wrote: > > > > I've backported the patch and applied it against the 5.4-lts branch in > > the drm-kmod repo, and the issue has not recurred. My patch is in a > > pull request at [3], and available as a patch file at [4]. Review > > and/or testing is very much appreciated. > I would be happy to test on my laptop running 13, is there an easy way > to download a branch and have it build using the ports infrastructure? > > I believe ports using github for distfiles expect a tag not branch. i > can test out building it locally outside of the ports tree, but wanted > to see if i could be lazy first :) I hacked the drm-fbsd13-kmod port to build my snapshot; you can use https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/tree/drm-kmod-issue-49 or just apply the change https://github.com/emaste/freebsd-ports/commit/1f54b67ad4b1ef93071f3d285a72f7cd8302a7ab. It looks like GH_TAGNAME indeed does not expect a branch, but a hash is permissible.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2ABRi1=rU5KOtRtWvH%2BVJJrqGz1SRtp45hNVLCkg3VLfA>