Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:08:39 +0200 From: Lefteris Tsintjelis <lefty@ene.asda.gr> To: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -STABLE was stable for long time (Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS?) Message-ID: <3DD8CA37.59AFE0A8@ene.asda.gr> References: <20021118002315.GA13171@submonkey.net> <20021118022259.062A1286A5@mail.tmseck.homedns.org> <20021118095913.GA21088@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ceri Davies wrote: > > Also, to those suggesting that Marc should be running -RELEASE anyway, consider > that bugs found in a -RELEASE typically have even less chance of getting fixed > than bugs found in -STABLE (because only "critical" bugfixes are allowed). > > Ceri OK, I am confused here. I was planning on setting up a production server and after reading all your messages, it still isn't clear to me weather it is going to be -STABLE or -RELEASE. Chances are -RELEASE of course but if a bug is found (rare most likely but still possible) and isn't committed fast enough, isn't this a big problem for a production server? Lefteris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DD8CA37.59AFE0A8>