From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  7 19:34:11 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C81110656DE;
	Tue,  7 Sep 2010 19:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from cp-out8.libero.it (cp-out8.libero.it [212.52.84.108])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A1D8FC20;
	Tue,  7 Sep 2010 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from soth.ventu (151.51.63.247) by cp-out8.libero.it (8.5.107)
	id 4C80E54D008E578D; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:34:09 +0200
Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18])
	by soth.ventu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o87JXuNw027250;
	Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:33:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Message-ID: <4C8693A7.9080608@netfence.it>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:33:59 +0200
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; it-IT;
	rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100805 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
References: <4C85EAF3.1090205@netfence.it> <867hiy2bg0.fsf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <867hiy2bg0.fsf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.1.2.13
Cc: garga@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: LUA fails upgrade on 7.2/amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:34:11 -0000

Il 09/07/10 10:40, Anonymous ha scritto:

> It's expected becasue you're overriding -fPIC in port's Makefile from
> your make.conf (CFLAGS=...). If you still want to *reduce* optimization
> then append CFLAGS by using `+=' instead of `='.

Thanks, this was the problem.

So, I've had the following in /etc/make.conf since eons:
CFLAGS=-O -pipe
COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe


Genrally speaking (meaning for any port), is this still useful?
Are the above flags deprecated?
Will I get optimized code without them?

  bye & Thanks
	av.