From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 13 13:36:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C56B16A47C for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fazaeli@sepehrs.com) Received: from sepehrs.com (sepehrs.com [213.217.59.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A3D13C4EF for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fazaeli@sepehrs.com) Received: from [192.168.1.150] ([192.168.1.150]) by sepehrs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lBDGw1N2028810 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:58:02 GMT (envelope-from fazaeli@sepehrs.com) Message-ID: <47613068.6080103@sepehrs.com> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:45:20 +0330 From: "H.fazaeli" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <476061FD.8050500@elischer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sepehr-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Sepehr-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Sepehr-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, timed out) X-MailScanner-From: fazaeli@sepehrs.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: bikeshed for all! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:36:36 -0000 What about "routing zone" or "forwarding zone" which may be abbreviated as "rtzone" or "fwdzone". Julian Elischer wrote: > So, I'm playing with some multiple routing table support.. > the first version is a minimal impact version with very limited > functionality. > It's done that way so I can put it in RELENG_6/7 without breaking ABIs > (I hope). > Later there will be a more flexible version for-current. > > Here's the question.. > > I need a word to use to describe the network view one is currently on.. > e.g. if you are usinghe second routing table, you could say I've set > xxx to 1 > (0 based).. > > > current;y in my code I'm using 'universe' but I don't like that.. > > one could think of it as a routing plane.. > each routing plane has he same interfaces on it but they are logically > treated differently becasue each plane has a different routing table. > > > so here's an axample of it in use now... > the names should change... > > setuniverse 1 netstat -rn > [shows table 1] > setuniverse 2 route add 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.2.1 > setuinverse 1 route add 10.0.0.0/24 192.168.3.1 > setuniverse 2 route -n get 10.0.0.3 > [shows 192.168.2.1] > setuniverse 1 route -n get 10.0.0.3 > [shows 192.168.3.1] > setuniverse 2 start_apache > [appache starts, always using 192.168.2.1 to reach the 10.0.0 net. > > > also the syscall is setuniverse() > > so, you see I really need a better name.... > setrtab? > > rtab? rtbl? > > and the command should be called "????" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- With best regards. Hooman Fazaeli Technical Manager Sepehr S. T. Co. Ltd. Web: http://www.sepehrs.com Tel: (9821)88975701-2 Fax: (9821)88983352