Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:21:23 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r382341 - in head/lang: gcc46 gcc47 gcc48 gcc49 gcc5 Message-ID: <55147853.30309@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5514746C.5010909@marino.st> References: <201503262036.t2QKa4Aw076378@svn.freebsd.org> <55147032.4020401@FreeBSD.org> <551470F9.60306@marino.st> <551472A3.8000105@FreeBSD.org> <5514746C.5010909@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --N6knn80bnJxQJ6GjPqHS7bexQ1gTwTkpu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/26/2015 4:04 PM, John Marino wrote: > On 3/26/2015 21:57, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 3/26/2015 3:50 PM, John Marino wrote: >>> On 3/26/2015 21:46, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>> On 3/26/2015 3:36 PM, John Marino wrote: >>>>> Author: marino >>>>> Date: Thu Mar 26 20:36:04 2015 >>>>> New Revision: 382341 >>>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/382341 >>>>> QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r382341/ >>>>> >>>>> Log: >>>>> lang/gcc(46,47,48,49,5): Use OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_DragonFly to block J= AVA >>>>> =20 >>>>> The JAVA frontend doesn't build on DragonFly on any release. The= new >>>>> OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_${OPSYS} feature is a nice way to avoid the use o= f >>>>> Makefile.DragonFly (most are in dports, but one is in lang/gcc5).= >>>>> =20 >>>>> The recent addition of CXXFLAGS to lang/gcc5 prevents Makefile.Dr= agonFly >>>>> on lang/gcc5 from being removed outright. There are a couple of = options >>>>> available to allow its removal, but I'll need to discuss with Ger= ald. >>>>> =20 >>>>> Approved by: DragonFly blanket >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Why do you ignore all feedback? I find this as grounds for removal o= f >>>> commit bit. >>>> >>>> Why do DragonFly hacks belong in FreeBSD Ports? Not even DragonFly u= ses >>>> FreeBSD Ports, it uses dports. So why can these hacks not be in dpor= ts? >>> >>> Please take these threats offline. >>> Your "feedback" directly conflicts with permission I've been given. >> >> No it absolutely does not. _Bapt_ gave you permission to do DragonFly >> cleanups yes. This is not a blank approval to whatever you want. I've >> voiced much feedback over the past few days (as well as amdmi3) that y= ou >> have completely ignored while hiding behind 'bapt approved it'. That i= s >> not how this community works. >=20 >=20 > I have blanket approval for non-invasive additions to support DragonFly= =2E > OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_${OPSYS} qualifies; it's a no-op for FreeBSD. You again ignore everything I say here. You then justify it because 1 portmgr approved it, and then go on to tell me portmgr is a committee. This blanket was never officially voted on. You can't have it both ways. AFAIK changing -pthread to -lpthread was not voted on either. 1 portmgr (adhoc) approving something does not remove the requirement to listen to feedback. >=20 >> I also asked you to try to be less dragonfly-specific this morning. I >> too am portmgr. Bapt's year+ old blanket approval does not mean you ge= t >> to ignore all new feedback. >> I really don't care if you have 900000 commits. You must follow the >> basic community rules of responding to feedback and listening to other= s. >> You constantly ignore others. >=20 > If I can't commit for DragonFly, I have no reason to commit at all. > portmgr is not a person, it's a committee. If the committee agrees wit= h > you that my total contributions (PRs, mentoring) are not worth some > non-invasive support, then pull my bit. >=20 > John >=20 --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --N6knn80bnJxQJ6GjPqHS7bexQ1gTwTkpu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVFHhTAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPoIQH/1juHkehj3zbrBybiR60S1Pq 1gLN/G2//12mhJOf05bNgLRejkz0FZ6n9IMXng1PeAB9L+LyO24lSk9c1YttD4Th mnBAecHzJrdaPozUH0ZSUwraMevaJTh5QWbTAnDLK+Hq2sl6DLkyG1HHPHpgmhGG jPRObNBvEjuXc4jB/3uVMNWXkHEs0PjxOQ9++bQ8EwIfjQ/DWgh1/JlhAehH93Sh LN4L7twg+4KUIfusUWwBq6o3Qj/cCm4TvqGrGq5FEAmTiOz2ELX095ELwknuWRd2 0HQIAGXolJrJipWlxrzno2+qW+3kWu/9wA6slVzEkjRPeQKzSHj23/4kcx0pQJg= =k+Vs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N6knn80bnJxQJ6GjPqHS7bexQ1gTwTkpu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55147853.30309>