From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 23 17:13:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909FB16A492 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: from web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E010343D45 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arne_woerner@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 87890 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Jun 2006 17:13:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=c1P/hIBBT7bdElyW8kQvCH4W2hX8uVLdxUUwlFn4bsiT7+sWjkGoZbrqvHMl3zE/sUehxrdFno8tUAP9Tgvt3LysB2OjKEAaG7q9DcR0DUJn0G9vnvy8ZmPOTegnvRnZGQhOdIwKn0ohRQSAw3WwH6c9QNopwQvfbWuTFj9IItY= ; Message-ID: <20060623171307.87888.qmail@web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.54.81.91] by web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:13:07 PDT Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 10:13:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "R. B. Riddick" To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200606231652.k5NGqoQ0023670@lurza.secnetix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Journaling UFS with gjournal. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:13:09 -0000 --- Oliver Fromme wrote: > R. B. Riddick wrote: > > Depends: > > If your existing file system needs its last sector, > > then it wont work. If it does not need it, then it > > might work (although fsck does not check for a > > raw-device shrinkage - I think)... > > It has no way to check it. > Hmm... Maybe it is not so interesting, but I wish fsck could say, if the partition in question is as big as it was when newfs built the file system... > file, and fsck(8) has no way to notice that, of course. > fsck could not even read the last sector of the former file system, because gjournal took it away... Or doesn't it? > If that sector happens to contain UFS meta data, fsck(8) > might detect the corruption and try to correct it, which > will destroy the gjournal meta data. > I think write access to that sector is not possible. Furthermore the device that is handed to fsck does not contain that meta data sector... At least I hope, that it is like that with my geom_mirror and geom_stripe discs... ;-) -Arne __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com