From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  9 10:01:02 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7E816A41F
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jul 2007 10:01:02 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from etc@fluffles.net)
Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl
	[195.64.95.160])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E5A13C4B7
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jul 2007 10:01:01 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from etc@fluffles.net)
Received: from 195-241-125-45.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl ([195.241.125.45]
	helo=[10.0.0.18])
	by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <etc@fluffles.net>)
	id 1I7q2v-000O6B-MW; Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:00:45 +0200
Message-ID: <46920754.6080901@fluffles.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:00:52 +0200
From: Fluffles <etc@fluffles.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ulf Lilleengen <lulf@stud.ntnu.no>
References: <20070709092252.GA7809@stud.ntnu.no>
In-Reply-To: <20070709092252.GA7809@stud.ntnu.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Patches for updated gvinum
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:01:02 -0000

Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gvinum just got better. At least, that's what I hope. Lukas rewrote gvinum to
> use a simpler and easier to handle single-thread event system, and I have been
> adapting existing code to this. The result can be found in the patches here:
>   

Nice to see gvinum get's the facelift it so desperately needed. It's 
unfortunate gvinum was never able to recover from the GEOM-age, until 
now maybe. :-)

However, do you think that it's performance is affected too? Last time i 
tested, i was not impressed with gvinum's RAID5 performance, write 
speeds were very low. RAID0 and RAID1 appeared to be on par with gstripe 
and gmirror though. I guess gvinum is primary for people who feel 
comfortable with its configuration and user-interface.

> Therefore, I hope many will
> test this patch and help discovering bugs that otherwise would just stay there.
>   

I will be able to test this on my new test system, coming Wedsnesday. 
This consists of a modern dualcore AMD 3GHz processor with 4GB RAM and 8 
SATA disks. If you like, i can report my findings to the list when i'm done.

Regards,

Veronica