From owner-cvs-ports Mon Nov 4 16:34:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-cvs-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA16927 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:34:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from sequent.kiae.su (sequent.kiae.su [193.125.152.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA16891; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:33:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by sequent.kiae.su id AA12793 (5.65.kiae-2 ); Tue, 5 Nov 1996 04:23:17 +0400 Received: by sequent.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Tue, 5 Nov 96 04:23:16 +0400 Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.ru (8.8.2/8.8.2) id DAA00753; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 03:17:07 +0300 (MSK) Message-Id: <199611050017.DAA00753@nagual.ru> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/apache/patches patch-ag patch-ac In-Reply-To: <57683lpmf1.fsf@tees.elsevier.co.uk> from "Paul Richards" at "Nov 4, 96 09:42:26 pm" To: p.richards@elsevier.co.uk (Paul Richards) Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 03:17:07 +0300 (MSK) Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org From: "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" (Andrey A. Chernov) Organization: self X-Class: Fast X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Hmm, wearing my Apache hat rather than my FreeBSD hat I've got to say > that I'm not very happy with this patch. This makes "FreeBSD/Apache" > incompatible with standard Apache since it has added configuration > options that Apache doesn't have and I don't think we'll be very happy > over in the Apache lists when we get support questions about the > "SuppressHTMLPreamble" option. You're going to get a seriously bad > name if FreeBSD applied patches create bugs that weren't present in > the original. If you don't use this new option, you still stay compatible, so I don't understand your complaints. If it hurt, don't use it, because it is nonstandard. > If you want to make changes like this then submit them to the Apache > team rather than embark on a FreeBSD/Apache. If you insist on doing > this then change the version string so this server is clearly marked > as being the FreeBSD enhanced version of Apache and then expect any > bug reports to be sent your way. I already submit this change to Apache group, the say that they will consider it. Apache development have very long period from version to version to wait. > These types of changes aren't "porting" patches and as such I don't > think they should be part of the ports structure. Like I said, if > you're interested in Apache development join the Apache development list. Porting process includes local enhancements too. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/