From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Dec 16 15:41:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89916A49603; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:41:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from valentine.liquidneon.com (valentine.liquidneon.com [216.87.78.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "valentine.liquidneon.com", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 602DB1A8F; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brd@FreeBSD.org) Received: by valentine.liquidneon.com (Postfix, from userid 1018) id 0D0071D850; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:41:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:41:21 +0000 From: Brad Davis To: Willem Jan Withagen Cc: Brad Davis , Warner Losh , Ronald Klop , freebsd-arm , Matthias Apitz , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: "libssl.so.8" not found Message-ID: <20151216154120.GE49345@corpmail.liquidneon.com> References: <20151214071840.GA3771@c720-r285885-amd64> <20151214153517.GB49345@corpmail.liquidneon.com> <56713633.10401@digiware.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56713633.10401@digiware.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:41:28 -0000 On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:00:19AM +0100, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > On 14-12-2015 16:35, Brad Davis wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:03:25AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Ronald Klop wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 10:11:35 +0100, Ronald Klop > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:18:40 +0100, Matthias Apitz > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> El d??a Sunday, December 13, 2015 a las 10:40:22PM -0800, Russell Haley > >>>>> escribi??: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi There, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am trying to bring up an Arm image off the FreeBSD website for my > >>>>>> hummingboard. The problem seems to be when I run pkg the system installs > >>>>>> the latest version - 1.6.2, and then fails with: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Shared object "libssl.so.8" not found, required by "pkg" > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've seen this in NextBSD, and DesktopBSD and even on my previous arm > >>>>>> image > >>>>>> but I was able to get around the problem by creating links from > >>>>>> libssl.so.7 > >>>>>> to libssl.so.8. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I have had the same issue on r285885 with ports as well from July this > >>>>> year and pkg 1.5.5 ... I accidently updated pkg to 1.6.x which could not > >>>>> find libssl.so.8; I forced back to 1.5.5 with an older pkg-static and > >>>>> now pkg > >>>>> complains about it database, but still works: > >>>>> > >>>>> $ pkg info pkg > >>>>> pkg: warning: database version 32 is newer than libpkg(3) version 31, > >>>>> but still compatible > >>>>> pkg-1.5.5 > >>>>> > >>>>> I don't know why pkg 1.6.2 was produced with this recent libssl.so.8; it > >>>>> should have been done more conservative, IMHO > >>>>> > >>>>> matthias > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> I had the same problem on my amd64 laptop. Your FreeBSD version is too > >>>> old. Upgrading the FreeBSD base will give you the new libssl version. After > >>>> that you can upgrade your packages. > >>>> > >>>> What version of FreeBSD is running on this hummingboard? I guess > >>>> 11-CURRENT. Probably ssl was upgraded in FreeBSD and the new packages are > >>>> build on this newer version. In 10-STABLE this is kept backwards > >>>> compatible, but in 11-CURRENT you have to keep up yourself. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Ronald. > >>>> > >>> > >>> It has to do with this message in /usr/src/UPDATING: > >>> > >>> > >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/UPDATING?r1=290206&r2=290207&pathrev=292177& > >> > >> > >> As a temporary measure, for bootstrapping or installing packages, you can > >> also > >> use libmap.conf to map libssl.so.7 to libssl.so.8. There's a second library > >> that > >> you'll find you need to map too. This will get you over the hump. However, > >> once you do upgrade, you'll need to remove the lines because slogin and such > >> have a check for the right version of openssl, and will give an error > >> message if > >> you try to use them cross-threaded. > > > > Or just use pkg-static. :) > > Cool trick, never though about that. > However that does not help with auxilary tools that are code to use pkg. :( > > So in the end I just manually build the pkg port, which will compile > against whatever is available as ssl-lib. Not the best solution, since > next time Bapt releases a new version, the game starts again. No. This was caused by ssl being bumped, not pkg. Pkg is updated regularly without this issue. > perhaps in this case it is best to move pkg-static to pkg? > and always use a static linked version. It is not like a deamon running > for ever. So the temporary overhead of 4Mb <> 150K code space would be > acceptable. There is talk about making the static version the default. Regards, Brad Davis