Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 20:44:06 +0200 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@gojira.at> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-12@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r361334 - in stable/12/sys: amd64/amd64 arm64/arm64 dev/acpica i386/i386 x86/acpica Message-ID: <20200522184406.GA99475@mail.bsd4all.net> In-Reply-To: <6c46560e-cc5b-ec15-d352-a3bf8eeede6a@FreeBSD.org> References: <202005211528.04LFSZFF068443@repo.freebsd.org> <87a720aowg.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <6c46560e-cc5b-ec15-d352-a3bf8eeede6a@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 08:57:44AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On 5/21/20 3:45 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > > > Until now it was possible to build a kernel (amd64) without 'device > > acpi'. After this commit it fails with this error: > > > > --- kernel.full --- > > linking kernel.full > > ld: error: undefined symbol: acpi_pxm_set_cpu_locality > >>>> referenced by mp_machdep.c:269 (/usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c:269) > >>>> mp_machdep.o:(cpu_mp_start) > > *** [kernel.full] Error code 1 > > > > Was that intended? > > I know Mark has already fixed this, but can you elaborate on your use case for > not compiling ACPI support into the kernel? Yes, thanks! I still use a Soekris Net6501-70 board. It shows the following errors when ACPI is enabled: Firmware Error (ACPI): A valid RSDP was not found (20200430/tbxfroot-369) [...] ACPI: Table initialisation failed: AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI: Try disabling either ACPI or apic support. It works fine without ACPI so I removed it. I need a custom kernel anyway (the kernel panics without 'device atpic'). -- Herbert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200522184406.GA99475>