From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 1 06:44:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393031065673 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 06:44:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CFC8FC0C for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 06:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so382259wyb.13 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:44:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WjQ2cBcoA3r6FJzxxAFhgcH9cwFAHxV55HvkOB4BiKE=; b=qbNH5y2dZTrhtnnB378UFXmrJTDNAvhkzS6zSBs8scxnyJ28oAvzRDTiREJV3GC+kJ mAvTHFYNdL9Nq1++GMd1BMxN3qyNYC6fxLpzUIaT7V2YfzAjvc6+pmb9wrT1y6CMq0Kx t0wjZR8zcDGnlnPQF3+YNtsrva8dXkgtb45UY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KqgNmp8EaUctjxetXGrY+UBPjID0n11DB3o0CoChTxExCC1I0zOF9eRJDa/DmdWhMr ghFVGFjgAITY7R9vF7B4GJByWPO36XmWmnc3XXyPzYzlt0PAP47pqKNB38bI9eV44Ry5 a3iQlIfRWccYx4QvOQCtF2MDC9ztQnLBU3vBc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.7.146 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:43:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BB43D4B.7060507@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:43:39 -0700 Received: by 10.216.87.79 with SMTP id x57mr205412wee.83.1270104219817; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: David Ehrmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel H55 and em0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 06:44:03 -0000 OH, as to my last statement, the code in CURRENT will NOT work on 8.0 RELEASE, it would require a change to sys/conf/files, and it also has a fix in the stack that is not in RELEASE. SO taking the latest would require you take the whole tree. Jack On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > The device subfamily on those motherboards is called PCH, and its only in > the em driver as of > last December, The CVS delta of if_em is 1.27. You can either update to > STABLE/8 or CURRENT. > If you wish to just pull the e1000 driver directory it should work fine in > 8.0 RELEASE also. > > Cheers, > > Jack > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:29 PM, David Ehrmann wrote: > >> I recently picked up a H55-based motherboard, and the ethernet interface >> isn't autodetected. dmesg lists it as the following: >> >> pci0: at device 25.0 (no driver attached) >> >> And pciconf lists this: >> >> none1@pci0:0:25:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00008086 chip=0x10ef8086 >> rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> >> >> I'm actually not sure it's an em device, but it's definitely gigabit, and >> googling suggests that others have recently run into the same issue. >> >> Since I'll probably have to recompile, is this currently working in recent >> builds of 8.0? This was just a vanilla 8.0 release image. Would some >> simple change tell the driver to recognize this card? >> >> Thanks in advance. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org >> " >> > >