From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 08:52:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F382516A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:52:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8C343D3F for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:52:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:200:0:8002:b130:5937:253a:915f]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B491521A; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:52:03 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:52:15 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Wilkinson, Alex" In-Reply-To: <20041206114646.GD999@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> References: <20041115222310.GA93130@scylla.towardex.com> <41B1EB4E.78490459@freebsd.org> <20041206114646.GD999@squash.dsto.defence.gov.au> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Initial review request for IPv6 Fast Forwarding and IP6STEALTH X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 08:52:05 -0000 >>>>> On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:16:46 +1030, >>>>> "Wilkinson, Alex" said: >> Nice, needs some cleanup though. Once you have cleaned it up you can run >> it either through me or gnn@. He is more of a IPv6 fan than I am (in my >> book IPv6 is broken by design^TM). > Why ? (Perhaps this is slightly an off-topic for this list, but) I'm also interested in the reason, but it's not surprising that someone in the world has a negative impression on a big feature like IPv6 or IPsec, since such a thing has typically both pros and cons. And whatever the reason is, the important thing I believe is to keep IPv6 implementation as good as IPv4 one on FreeBSD, in terms of both stability and functionality. I'm quite sure the fact that FreeBSD has provided a good IPv6 implementation has enlarged the user base of this particular operating system, comparing to, e.g., Linux. So, I hope core FreeBSD developers to care about the quality of IPv6 implementation as seriously as that of IPv4 implementation, regardless of their own position on IPv6 itself. As an IPv6-related person, I'm willing to help that process if I can do something in that area. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp