Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:47:25 -0700 From: J & C Frazier <admin@csocs.com> To: Edwin Culp <eculp@EnContacto.Net> Cc: alex huppenthal <alex@aspenworks.com>, isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail and NSI Message-ID: <3A67727D.44A40EF4@csocs.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101171719490.22366-100000@workhorse.iMach.com> <3A663920.A79412FC@csocs.com> <3A663AE7.E1F2AFA5@csocs.com> <00dc01c080e8$166f6120$1700a8c0@d7k> <979796477.3a6681fda7468@Mail.MexComUSA.net> <014701c0811a$27800cd0$1700a8c0@d7k> <979824566.3a66efb633063@Mail.MexComUSA.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Negative, that is obviously a problem of yours. csocs.com resolves just fine. There is no dns problem here, only a routing/filter problem with a node inbetween me and NSI. Edwin Culp wrote: > Alex, > > Thanks. I just found what is probably the Network Solutions problem in my > maillog quite by accident. > > I have several hundred of these. > > Jan 18 05:20:38 EnContacto sendmail[83075]: f0IDKcm83075: ruleset=check_mail, > arg1=<admin@csocs.com>, relay=root@shell.csocs.com [207.49.21.231] (may be > forged), reject=451 4.1.8 <admin@csocs.com>... Domain of sender address > admin@csocs.com does not resolve > Jan 18 05:20:38 EnContacto sendmail[83075]: f0IDKcm83075: > from=<admin@csocs.com>, size=1313, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, > relay=root@shell.csocs.com [207.49.21.231] (may be forged) > Jan 18 05:20:39 EnContacto sendmail[83076]: f0IDKdm83076: ruleset=check_mail, > arg1=<admin@csocs.com>, relay=root@shell.csocs.com [207.49.21.231] (may be > forged), reject=451 4.1.8 <admin@csocs.com>... Domain of sender address > admin@csocs.com does not resolve > Jan 18 05:20:39 EnContacto sendmail[83076]: f0IDKdm83076: > from=<admin@csocs.com>, size=4310, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, > relay=root@shell.csocs.com [207.49.21.231] (may be forged) > Jan 18 05:22:46 EnContacto sendmail[83115]: f0IDMhm83115: ruleset=check_mail, > arg1=<admin@csocs.com>, relay=root@shell.csocs.com [207.49.21.231], reject=451 > 4.1.8 <admin@csocs.com>... Domain of sender address admin@csocs.com does not > resolve > > IMHO, step one is fix the DNS and take it from there. Hopefully/probably this > will get him up a going. > > provecho y saludos, > > ed > > Quoting alex huppenthal <alex@aspenworks.com>: > > > Ed, > > > > Thanks for your comments. I agree, it's strange. However, J & C Frazier > > commented that there are 'A' record in that server. Unless it's configured > > to be available only to private users, there's definitely a problem. no A > > records means Bind is broken there. *s > > > > Hope it helps. It's pretty nice to see everyone pitching in to help out > > like this. > > > > -Alex > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Edwin Culp" <eculp@EnContacto.Net> > > To: "alex huppenthal" <alex@aspenworks.com> > > Cc: "J & C Frazier" <admin@csocs.com>; "Forrest W. Christian" > > <forrestc@imach.com>; <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:41 PM > > Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail and NSI > > > > > > > Alex, > > > > > > Thanks, nice to have access to dlint - webbased. I can think of many > > times when > > > it would have really come in handy. > > > > > > As far as the csocs.com problem is concerned, one thing really got my > > attention. > > > > > > ;; trying nameserver NS.csocs.com. > > > ERROR: no A records found. > > > > > > That might be a good place to start. > > > > > > I also get that none of the NS are authoritative > > > > > > named-xfer[1610]: [207.49.21.234] not authoritative for csocs.com, SOA > > query got > > > rcode 0, aa 0, ancount 1, aucount 0 > > > and > > > named-xfer[1624]: [207.49.20.5] not authoritative for csocs.com, SOA > > query got > > > rcode 0, aa 0, ancount 1, aucount 3 > > > and > > > named-xfer[1629]: [207.49.21.235] not authoritative for csocs.com, SOA > > query > > > got rcode 0, aa 0, ancount 1, aucount 0 > > > > > > not good > > > > > > ed > > > > > > Quoting alex huppenthal <alex@aspenworks.com>: > > > > > > > you are welcome to use our dlint window to debug your DNS > > > > > > > > http://aspenworks.com/development/dns2.php > > > > > > > > dlint is a nice utility, we've just put a php wrapper around it for > > > > web-based use. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "J & C Frazier" <admin@csocs.com> > > > > To: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com>; "Edwin Culp" > > > > <eculp@EnContacto.Net>; <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 5:37 PM > > > > Subject: Re: Problems with sendmail and NSI > > > > > > > > > > > > > Interesting, it also appears ns.csocs.com is giving non-authoritive > > > > > responces on zones and domains it should be controlling. What > > > > > a mess. > > > > > > > > > > J & C Frazier wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The IP is 207.49.21.231 (csocs.com). Also note the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > # nslookup > > > > > > Default Server: localhost.csocs.com > > > > > > Address: 127.0.0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > networksolutions.com > > > > > > Server: localhost.csocs.com > > > > > > Address: 127.0.0.1 > > > > > > Non-authoritative answer: > > > > > > Name: networksolutions.com > > > > > > Address: 216.168.224.69 > > > > > > > > > > > > > ns1.netsol.com > > > > > > Server: localhost.csocs.com > > > > > > Address: 127.0.0.1 > > > > > > Non-authoritative answer: > > > > > > Name: ns1.netsol.com > > > > > > Address: 216.168.224.200 > > > > > > > > > > > > > server ns1.netsol.com > > > > > > Default Server: ns1.netsol.com > > > > > > Address: 216.168.224.200 > > > > > > > > > > > > > csocs.com > > > > > > Server: ns1.netsol.com > > > > > > Address: 216.168.224.200 > > > > > > *** Request to ns1.netsol.com timed-out > > > > > > > > > > > > > networksolutions.com > > > > > > Server: ns1.netsol.com > > > > > > Address: 216.168.224.200 > > > > > > *** Request to ns1.netsol.com timed-out > > > > > > > > > > > > This tells me there's evidently some sort of dns issue I guess. > > > > > > > > > > > > J.C. Frazier > > > > > > > > > > > > "Forrest W. Christian" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't have TCP connectivity between you and them, there is > > > > > > > definately some sort of routing or filtering issue between point > > a > > > > and > > > > b. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would you be kind enough to (perhaps privately) send me the IP > > > > address > > > > of > > > > > > > the machine in question so I can see what it looks like > > routing-wise > > > > from > > > > > > > here (perhaps I can see something). > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > EnContacto.Net - InternetSalon.Org - CafeMania.Net > > > -- > > > > > > > > > -- > EnContacto.Net - InternetSalon.Org - CafeMania.Net > -- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A67727D.44A40EF4>