From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 06:39:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB58516A4BF for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.sat.corp.rackspace.com (mx.sat.corp.rackspace.com [64.39.1.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C865A44013 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 06:39:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from amason@rackspace.com) Received: from mail.rackspace.com (mail.rackspace.com [64.39.2.181]) h85Dbq326228 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:37:52 -0500 Received: from [10.1.101.24] (office101-24.sat.rackspace.com [10.1.101.24]) by mail.rackspace.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h85DdLuh020017 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:39:21 -0500 From: Art Mason To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1062769170.36354.41.camel@mizar.rackspace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 05 Sep 2003 08:39:30 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Dd6rvCg9: Found to be clean Subject: PF in 4.8-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:39:24 -0000 My apologies in advance if this is the wrong list to ask this in, but how well does pf work in 4.8-STABLE? And if so, what kernel options do I need to compile in? Can pf kernel options coexist w/ IPFW options, if I keep the IPFW modulus from loading? Can I still bridge in regular fashion w/ pf? I've already read up on http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/install.html, but this seemd a bit dated, as is refers to "upcoming OpenBSD 3.3", which has been out for some time now, as I see you can already preorder for 3.4. Thanks in advance for any assistance w/ this issue. -- Art Mason