From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 00:04:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F191AB46 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@daemonic.se) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8861F2864 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B72D40007 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 41B5740004; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:04:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (mx.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23ABA40003; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:59:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3cL5RM43mbz8hVn; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:58:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id 7guLnw0mq5Pu; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3cL5RJ6G4cz8hVm; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (celes.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::3]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cL5RJ4r2Cz9Ctj; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:58:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5215540B.3040004@daemonic.se> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:58:03 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: Problem with the most recent Intel driver References: <1377099425.10745.12486709.048AEAE7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1377099516.11034.12488249.7E71D03C@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130821-0, 2013-08-21), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:04:35 -0000 On 2013-08-21 18:36, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 10:37, Mark Felder wrote: >>> switching for the new DRI/KVM/Intel/whatever framework is finished. I >> >> I meant KMS. Don't know why I said KVM. >> >> Anyway... >> > > You said KVM because of just too many TLAs. > > As far as timing is concerned, see the latest FreeBSD project quarterly > status update: > "The first deliverables of the project, including moused(8), ukbd(4), > and KMS support are expected to arrive around the middle or end of > August 2013. The whole project is expected to complete in November > 2013." Hopefully the KMS aware console will make it in time for FreeBSD 10.0, although that is a somewhat tight schedule. > > Of course, these will be delivered to head, not stable, at least initially. > It's been over a year since I have run -current, butthis will get me back > to life on the cutting, and likely bleeding edge. > Current has been reasonably stable, at least for me. There are most likely some rough edges though. I don't know if it will be possible to MFC the console work to 9-STABLE. Regards! --