From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 23:59:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6928A16A400; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0584F43D45; Mon, 8 May 2006 23:59:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k48Nxq6x010733; Mon, 8 May 2006 19:59:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 19:59:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20060508.174813.89129442.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: References: <445FB11C.1000309@samsco.org> <20060508.174813.89129442.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: re@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shared library version bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 23:59:56 -0000 On Mon, 8 May 2006, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: > Daniel Eischen writes: > : On Mon, 8 May 2006, Scott Long wrote: > : > : > Daniel Eischen wrote: > : >> In preparation for release of 7.0, can we please have > : >> a shared library version bump? I'd like to enable > : >> symbol versioning by default. > : >> > : > > : > Sorry, this has been a low priority in my brain due to 6.1. > : > : No problem. I intentionally waited until 6.1 was just about > : done before pinging you again. > : > : > Yes, we do want this. You should send out appropriate HEADS UP > : > emails before and after it happens so that everyone is prepared. > : > Did you want to be in charge of all of this, or did you have > : > someone else in mind? > : > : I've not done this before. Is it just a matter of bumping > : SHLIB_MAJOR in lib/Makefile.inc and lib/*/Makefile? > > Hopefully this will be the last major bump for a long time... > Otherwise, why bother with symbol versioning at all... For libraries with symbol versioning, yes, that's the plan. To date, that's libc, libm, libthr, libpthread, and libthread_db. If other libraries become symbol versioned after 7.0 gets released, then those libraries will need another version bump. -- DE